SITQ E.U., Inc. v. Reata Restaurants, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN CAYCE, Chief Justice.
I. Introduction
In this interlocutory appeal, SITQ E.U., Inc., SITQ Holdings (U.S.), Inc., Canderel Corp., and Jonathan Wener (collectively, appellants) appeal the trial court’s denial of their special appearance motions challenging the trial court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction over them. Because we conclude that appellants had sufficient contacts with Texas to support the exercise of specific jurisdiction, we will affirm.
II. Background Facts & Procedural History
SITQ E.U., Inc. is a Canadian corporation that owns 100% of SITQ Holdings (U.S.), Inc. 1 SITQ…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Ennis v. Loiseau, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- Morris v. Kohls-York, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- Lewis v. Indian Springs Land Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
- Morris v. Powell, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
- TravelJungle v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.