Nasworthy v. James
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint for land. Before Judge Hardeman. Emanuel superior court.’ January 21, 1921.
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.
1. A deed to land is not void for uncertainty of description, if it furnishes the key to the identification of the land intended to be conveyed by the grantor. Civil Code (1910), § 4182; Swint v. Swint, 147 Ga. 467 (2) (94 S. E. 571); Boyd v. Sanders, 148 Ga. 839 (98 S. E. 490). Accordingly, it was not erroneous to admit in evidence a deed describing the land as “the Pollett old mill tract of land” in a named militia district and county. Ga. & Ala. Ry. Co. v. Shiver, 121 Ga. 708 (49 S. E. 700); Reeves v. Allgood, 133 Ga. 835 (3), 836 (67 S. E. 82).
2. Where in an action for land the plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Swint v. SwintSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Boyd v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Reeves v. Allgood & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Cox v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Georgia & Alabama Railway v. ShiverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
3Cited by4 opinions
- Haygood v. DuncanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Knighton v. HastySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Morgan v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Homeyer v. TowlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950