Legal Opinion

Homeyer v. Towler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 6, 1950No. 32732PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.

The eight grounds of the motion for new trial all assign error on the ruling of the court that the description contained in the contract of lease was insufficient to furnish a key and to permit the receipt in evidence of parol testimony, to locate the property and its bounds, and because the court excluded from evidence testimony of certain named witnesses relating to the bounds of the leased premises, which testimony would have fixed the exact location and extent of the property leased. Thus, as we view the record, the sole question raised by the eight special grounds of the motion for new…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crawford v. VernerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. King v. BriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Pearson v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Harriss v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flint Explosive Co. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Flint Explosive Co. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API