Cox v. Goodman
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint for land. Before Judge Thomas. Berrien superior court. September 21, 1911.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
1. Where, upon the trial of a complaint for land, the defendant sought to -prove title by prescription under color of title, it was not error to admit in evidence, over the plaintiffs’ objection, the sheriff’s deed made to the defendant’s predecessor in title, who purchased at the sheriff’s sale, because the fi. fa. under which the land in controversy was sold did not accompany the deed. Hammond v. Crosby, 68 Ga. 767; Beverly v. Burke, 9 Ga. 440 (54 Am. D. 351); Connell v. Culpepper, 111 Ga. 805 (35 S. E. 667); Wardlaw v. McNeill, 106 Ga. 32 (31 S. E. 785; Street v. Collier, 118 Ga. 470 (45…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beverly v. BurkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Street v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Johnson v. Leffler Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Gillis v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Hammond & Hinson v. Crosby & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nasworthy v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921