Legal Opinion
State v. Bloom
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 14, 2004No. AC 24915PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The pro se defendant, Jerome H. Bloom, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of injury to property in violation of § 152-10 A of the Stratford code of ordinances, 1 which prohibits the injuring of property in public recreational areas. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the town ordinance is unconstitutionally vague, (2) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, (3) the court abused its discretion in excluding from evidence certain photographs and (4) the court abused its discretion in not granting a continuance in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. AillonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. DeloretoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. NelsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. SkiddConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. MuleroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. DeJesusConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.