Legal Opinion
State v. Mulero
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 20, 2005No. AC 24831PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, Felipe Mulero, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of forgery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-139 (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction, (2) the trial court improperly failed to instruct the jury that unanimity on one of the two alternative theories of criminal liability was required for a guilty verdict and (3) prosecutorial misconduct during the state’s closing argument deprived him of a fair trial. We affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. PaulingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. MartinezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. CaracogliaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. NecaiseConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. GaymonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.