Legal Opinion

State v. Aillon

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 3, 1987No. 12612; 12613; 12614PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The principal issue in this case is the propriety of several trial court rulings arising out of the alleged unavailability of an expert witness for the defense. The defendant, Guillermo Aillon, was charged by three separate indictments with having committed three murders in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54.1 Two previous trials on these charges failed to result in a conclusive judgment of either conviction or acquittal. In the present third trial, a jury found him guilty on each of the indictments and the trial court, Hadden, J., sentenced him to three consecutive terms of imprisonment…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State v. LammeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. State v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API