Legal Opinion
State v. Ouellette
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 10, 1983No. 10799PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
After a trial to the jury, the defendant was found guilty of one count 1 of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21. 2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court erred: (1) in admitting evidence of alleged prior uncharged sexual acts of the child victim with the defendant and, if admissible, in not charging the jury of the limited purpose for which such evidence could be used; (2) in admitting hearsay statements for purposes of constancy of accusation and, if admissible, in not charging the jury on the limited purpose for which such evidence could be used;…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. RodgersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. BramanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.