Reclamation Dist. No. 17 v. Bonbini
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. A. Plummer, Geo. P. McNoble, and John E. Budd, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action under section 3493% of the Political Code to determine the validity of an assessment levied for the purposes of Reclamation District No. 17 on lands within the district within one year prior to the filing of the complaint. Judgment was given for plaintiff confirming the assessment, and -defendants, who are landowners within the district, appeal from such judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
Reclamation District No. 17 was organized prior to January 1, 1873, and has ever since been prosecuting the object for which it was created. It is claimed by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Reclamation District No. 551 v. RunyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Lower Kings River Reclamation District No. 531 v. McCullahCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hershey v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Bonander v. Town of TiburonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Reclamation Dist. No. 673 v. DiepenbrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Meyer v. Reclamation District No. 17California Supreme Court · 1916
- Spurrier v. Reclamation District No. 17California Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.