Legal Opinion
Pabst Brewing Co. v. Jacobs
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 18, 1982No. Civ. A. 82-627PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LATCHUM, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, Pabst Brewing Company and William F. Smith, Jr., its president, chief executive officer and shareholder (collectively referred to as “Pabst”) have brought this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202 and Rule 57, F.R.Civ.P., seeking a declaratory judgment and also ancillary injunctive relief against the defendants, Irwin L. Jacobs, Dennis M. Mathisen, Daniel T. Lindsay and Gerald A. Schwalbach, individually and as members of the Shareholders’ Committee To Revitalize Pabst (collectively referred to as “Revitalization Committee”), from obtaining and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,068 General Aircraft Corporation v. Irwin S. LampertCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Standard Power & Light Corp. v. Investment Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1947
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,656 Alan L. Spielman v. General Host Corporation, General Host CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kalmanovitz v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- In Re Mony Group, Inc. Shareholder Lit.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
- Energy Ventures, Inc. v. Appalachian Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- Kalmanovitz v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Kalmanovitz v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.