Legal Opinion
Kalmanovitz v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 1, 1985No. 84-5682PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal, certified to us by the district court, arises in the aftermath of a bitter fight to gain control of Pabst Brewing Company. Plaintiff, a disappointed tender offeror, has sued his former partner, the successful acquiring company, and the target company, alleging violations of the federal antitrust and securities laws; in addition, plaintiff raised a variety of state law claims. Except for a breach of contract claim, the district court either dismissed or granted summary judgment to the defendants on all federal and state law causes of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robert E. Pincus v. Pabst Brewing Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Northeast Women's Center, Inc. v. McMonagleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Paul Kalmanovitz v. G. Heileman Brewing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- In Re Pressure Sensitive Labelstock Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Polaroid Corp. v. DisneyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.