National Grocer Co. v. Plotler
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wexford; Lamb, J. Garnishment by the National Grocer Company against Robert Plotler upon an account and indebtedness of George Hanna, principal defendant. A judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by the garnishee defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
The garnishee defendant reviews by writ of error a judgment against him upon a directed verdict.
Plaintiff, having secured a judgment against the principal defendant in the sum of $217.23, sued out a writ of garnishment against Plotler, as garnishee of Hanna. Plotler disclosed no liability. Upon the trial of the issue, it appeared that Plotler had purchased from Hanna a stock of general merchandise, in bulb, without complying with the provisions of the statute (Act No. 223, Pub. Acts 1905) relative to sales in bulk. It further appeared that the judgment against the principal defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Musselman Grocer Co. v. Kidd, Dater & Price Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Spurr v. TravisMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Marquette County Savings Bank v. KoivistoMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fecheimer-Keifer Co. v. BurtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- Watkins v. AngusMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Gazett v. Iola Co-operative Mercantile Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- National Bank v. FrydlewiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Musselman v. GrossmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.