Legal Opinion

In re Loomis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 6, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, P. J.

This appeal is from an order which makes an allowance of $2,357.67 to the attorney for the respondents and $100 to his client Anna Loomis Stoddard for disbursements from a fund of $4,715.33 deposited in the New York State National Bank, Albany, N. Y., under section 28 of the Court of Claims Act, and which belongs equally to one of the respondents and the appellant.

The source of the fund was an award of $2,004.50 made by the Court of Claims on February T9, 1918, op account of lands appropriated on or about December 1, 1910, by the State of New York for canal purposes. At the time of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Little Falls Fibre Co. v. Henry Ford & Son, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. House v. Amsdell Brewing & Malting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Little Falls Fibre Co. v. Henry Ford & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  4. People v. . Three Barrels FullNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Claim of Swartz, Inc. v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Binderman v. KazdanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1989
  2. In re LoomisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API