Little Falls Fibre Co. v. Henry Ford & Son, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Each of the plaintiffs owns a manufacturing plant located on the northerly side of the fourth branch of the Mohawk river. A short distance westerly there is a dam across this branch. The water so impounded flows through a canal to the plants, where fourteen feet of head is available for power. The tailrace returns the water to the same stream from which it was taken. The dam and canal, *560together with the plants as they are presently used, “ have been owned, possessed, used, occupied, operated and maintained by the plaintiffs and their predecessors in title continuously since in or about the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Oswego Syracuse R.R. Co. v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cuglar v. Power AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Tucker V. ToiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Byrne v. New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic PreservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Reese v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
- Foreman v. Louis Jacques Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.