Legal Opinion
People v. . Three Barrels Full
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cardozo, J.:
The controversy before us has to do with an award of costs.
A peace officer of the city of New York seized intoxicating liquors, held, as he charged, in violation of law. He made return of his proceedings in accordance with the statute to a judge who was authorized to issue a warrant (Code Crim. Proc., § 802-b, subd. 6). Thereupon demand for the return of the property was made by the owner, one Russato, who served an answer denying the legality of the seizure. “ If such answer is interposed, the issue thus framed shall be deemed an action pending in the court of the judge or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. ReganSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Lilienthal's Tobacco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Cassidy v. . McFarlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- People Ex Rel. New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children v. GilmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Traffic Truck Sales Co. v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Commonwealth v. Certain Confiscated LiquorsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- State v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- In re LoomisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Derr v. FlemingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.