Legal Opinion
Claim of Swartz, Inc. v. City of Utica
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 2, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
The petitioners are attorneys and counselors at law and practicing their profession at the city of Utica. On the 19th day of December, 1924, they were employed by Swartz, Inc., to prosecute a claim for damages against the city, resulting from a change of grade of Genesee street in front of premises occupied by said Swartz, Inc.
The proceedings for ascertaining the damages resulting from such street improvements were instituted by the city in pursuance of the provisions of its charter (Laws of 1923, chap. 658, art. 6, §§ 5-11), commissioners were appointed, hearings were had, the commissioners…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fischer-Hansen v. . Bklyn. Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- King v. . the Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Claim of Ehrsam v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Matter of ScheierNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- In re ScheierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of LevineNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- United States v. HudsonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1941
- Todd v. Mutual Factors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- In re AlbrechtNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- In re LoomisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936