Legal Opinion

Spokane Valley State Bank v. Murphy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1929No. 21348. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

On March 21, 1927, appellant took der livery of a Chrysler automobile from the Finch Motor Company, and on the same day signed a conditional sales contract, together with a note, agreeing to pay the balance of $973.20 at the rate of $81.10 per month, beginning April 21, 1927. Respondent purchased this conditional sales contract on the 22d day of March, and the record shows that three payments were made, and further payment being refused, the car was re-plevied. The remittances sent to respondent covering the first two payments were sent by the Finch Motor Company, the third payment being made…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Blanck v. Pioneer Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Schultz v. Citizens' Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. Peterson v. Bergman Cabinet Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Inland Finance Co. v. Inland Motor Car Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Burge v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Neeley v. BockWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Maxwell v. Provident Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. C.I.T. Corporation v. StrainWashington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API