Blanck v. Pioneer Mining Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered March 31, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for an accounting, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
Action in equity for an accounting. The following facts are undisputed. Prior to September 1, 1909, plaintiffs owned a leasehold interest in “Bench Claim Number Six Below Good Luck on the Left Limit of Anvil Creek,” in the Nome Mining District, in Alaska, in the following proportions: C. A. Vogel one-eighth, E. L. Blanck one-half, H. B. Ames three-eighths. Their lease authorized them to extract the gold, paying to the owners of the claim a royalty of thirty-two and one-half per cent of the gross output. On September 1, 1909, by written agreement, they sold their interests to defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Valley Lumber Co. v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Oliver Ditson Co. v. BatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Gallinger v. Lake Shore Traffic Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Hibberd v. SlackU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Red Wing Malting Co. v. WillcutsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Rayonier, Incorporated v. F. Arnold PolsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Cannon v. NicholasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Application of Central Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Codd v. Westchester Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1942
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.