Legal Opinion

Berglund Chevrolet, Inc. v. Landrum

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided September 7, 2004No. 2897033PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELSEY, Judge.

Berglund Chevrolet, Inc. and the VADA Group Self-Insurance Association (collectively “Berglund”) contend that the Workers’ Compensation Commission erred by finding that Richard Landrum’s sexual dysfunction was a compensable consequence of a work-related injury. Berglund also argues that the statute of limitations and equitable doctrine of laches bar Landrum’s claim. Finding no error in the commission’s findings, we affirm its award.

I

We view the evidence on appeal in the light most favorable to Landrum, the prevailing party before the commission. Clinchfield Coal Co. v. Reed, 40…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Dollar General Store v. CridlinCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  2. Clinchfield Coal Co. v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  3. Central Virginia Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.C. v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  4. Princess Anne Hills Civic League, Inc. v. Susan Constant Real Estate TrustSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  5. Leonard v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Farmington Country Club, Inc. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  2. Cris R. Anderson v. Cris R. Anderson, d/b/a Anderson Plumbing and Firstcomp Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
  3. Clifton v. Clifton Cable Contracting, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  4. Vital Link, Inc. and Argonaut Insurance Company v. Denzil B. HopeCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
  5. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., n/k/a, etc. v. Wardell Orthopaedics, P.C.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2017

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API