Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Wilgus
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 26, 2012No. 6 MAP 2010PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice EAKIN.
The Commonwealth appeals from the Superior Court order affirming the trial court’s dismissal of charges against appellee for violation of Megan’s Law requirements. For the following reasons, we reverse.
Appellee was convicted in 1998 of aggravated indecent assault; he received a sentence of five years to life imprisonment, was found to be a sexually violent predator, and was ordered to comply with Megan’s Law registration requirements. The Superior Court vacated this sentence and remanded for resentencing without application of Megan’s Law registration requirements;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. ColavitaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Chanceford Aviation Properties, L.L.P. v. Chanceford Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- State v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- People v. DowdyMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- A.S. v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. RahmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. MusauSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. GehrisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- People v. AllmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.