Legal Opinion
Probst v. Com., Dept. of Transp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 26, 2004No. 81 MAP 2001PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice CAPPY.
This is a direct appeal brought under 42 Pa.C.S. § 722(7) from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Clinton County, sustaining Appellee’s statutory appeal and ordering the appellant, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (“Penn-DOT” or the “Department”), to restore Appellee’s operating privileges following a one year suspension for driving under the influence of alcohol (“DUI”) whether or not he complies with Act 63 of 2000 (“Act 63” or the “Act”), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 7001-7003, and installs an approved interlock…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Mother's Restaurant, Inc. v. KrystkiewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Kramer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Alexander v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- In the Interest of K.A.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.