Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 2006No. 143 MAP 2004PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

In the case sub judice, we are asked to decide whether the Commonwealth Court was correct in holding that the Firsi^Level Supervisor Collective Bargaining Act, 43 *1087P.S. §§ 1103.101-1103.701 (the “Act”), violates Article III, Section 32 of the Pennsylvania Constitution and therefore is unconstitutional. The Act applies to a single public employer: appellee Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (the “Commission”) and mandates collective bargaining with the Commission’s first-level supervisors. For the following reasons, we agree that the Act is unconstitutional special…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. MockaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Tosto v. Pennsylvania Nursing Home Loan AgencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Curtis v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Wheeler v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Zauflik, A., Aplt. v. Pennsbury School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Burger v. School Board of McGuffey School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API