Legal Opinion

Dickson v. Rucho, 366 NC 332

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 25, 2013No. 201PA12PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

In this appeal we consider whether section 120-133 of the North Carolina General Statutes waives the right of legislators to assert the attorney-client privilege or work-product doctrine in litigation concerning redistricting. Because any waiver of such well-established legal principles must be clear and unambiguous, we conclude that the statute’s silence on such waivers renders the statute ambiguous as to this issue. After further analysis, we conclude that the General Assembly did not intend to waive either the attorney-client privilege or work-product doctrine when it…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Swidler & Berlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State Ex Rel. Martin v. PrestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Ridge Community Investors, Inc. v. BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Kent Stahle v. CTS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  2. Dillon v. BMO Harris Bank, N.A.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2014
  3. Applewood Properties, LLC v. New South Properties, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Sessions v. SloaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. Southern Power Company v. Cleveland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API