Legal Opinion

State v. Goding

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 16, 1984No. 83-238PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant was charged with driving while intoxicated, second offense, RSA 265:82, and with driving without proof of financial responsibility in violation of RSA 263:63. After a jury trial in Superior Court (Contas, J.), the defendant was found guilty of driving without proof of financial responsibility, and a mistrial was declared on the DWI charge after the jury was unable to reach a verdict. The defendant appeals the failure of the trial court, during the jury selection process, to propound specific voir dire questions to the jury venire. We reverse.

Prior to trial, defense counsel…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Joe Don BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Edward RuckerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. SegalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WamalaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. State v. JaromaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. State v. LakeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. State v. GodingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  5. State v. CereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API