State v. Goding
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
In this appeal the defendant contests his conviction in Superior Court {Pappagianis, J.) for driving while intoxicated (DWI)-second offense, RSA 265:82. He argues that (1) the State was constitutionally barred from charging him with DWI-second offense prior to a trial de novo in superior court, after he was *269tried and convicted of DWI-first offense in district court; (2) his post-arrest admissions, uttered in response to implied consent law questioning, see RSA 265:84 et seq. (1982 and Supp. 1985), should have been suppressed because Miranda warnings had not yet been given; and (3) we should…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. AyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. MartiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- State v. AbramSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- State v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.