Legal Opinion
United States v. Segal
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 7, 1976No. Nos. 75-1534 and 75-1539PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
Defendants were tried jointly and convicted of conspiracy and bribery of a public official in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 201(b)(2), arising out of the payment of money to an Internal Revenue agent to falsify a tax liability. We reverse the convictions and remand for a new trial because the voir dire examination of the jury panel and the cross-examination of the prosecution’s witnesses were improperly restricted.
Defendant Segal was a certified public accountant who represented the defendant Hurst during an audit of his tax returns by Internal…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ristaino v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. Franklin Evon Sebetich A/K/A Frank, Earl Dean, Jr., A/K/A Dooney, Michael John BuhoveckyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. James Pedroza, Francisco C. Pelaes, Jose Perez, and Enrique Jesus OsornoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Joe Don BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. William Boyd, James D'metri, Michael J. Lipton, Stephen Powell, George ParrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Steven B. WEISS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.