Legal Opinion

Bassett v. Budlong

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1889PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Ejectment. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtOhamplin, J.

This is an action of ejectment to recover possession of the east half of the south-west fractional quarter, and the south-west quarter of the southwest fractional quarter, of section 18, township 5 north, range 11 west, which lands plaintiffs claim in fee.

The case was tried before the court without a jury, and upon request of the parties the court made a written finding of facts; from which it appears that on August *34315, 1873, one William H. Budlong was the 'owner in fe.e of the premises, and resided thereon with his wife, Annette Budlong. He also at that time owned considerable personal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Ludlow v. MyersNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  2. Fisher v. ProvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Allen v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Lessee of Stouffer v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1794
  5. Kenrick v. SmickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Uhl v. Ohio River RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Montgomery v. Central National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Durand v. HigginsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Hicks v. SprankleTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Pegg v. PeggMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API