Legal Opinion
Pegg v. Pegg
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1911No. Docket No. 101PublishedCited by 25 opinions
Appeal from Grand Traverse; Mayne, J. Bill by Mary O. Pegg against John Pegg, James Pegg, William Pegg, Mary Pegg, and Sarah Nichols to quiet title. Prom an order overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
The bill of complaint in this cause calls for the construction of a deed made by Davis Pegg to Mary C. Pegg, the complainant. Davis Pegg was the husband of complainant, and in the year 1897 he conveyed to her, by warranty deed in the usual form, an undivided one-half interest in and to the following described premises:
“ The west half (W. ½) of the southeast quarter (S. E. ¼) of section three (3), and the west half (W. ½) of the northeast quarter (N. E. ¼) of section ten (10), in Grand Traverse county.”
In the deed, between the granting and the habendum clauses, is inserted the following clause:
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bassett v. BudlongMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by25 opinions
- Strout v. BurgessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
- Rogers v. RogersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hicks v. SprankleTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Bennett v. HutchensTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Runions v. RunionsTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.