Hicks v. Sprankle
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox County.— Hon. Chas. Hays Brown, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook
This is an action upon the covenant of seisin in a deed conveying to complainants certain land in Knox county. It is insisted that the deed of Mrs. Allie Taylor to her husband, J. S. Taylor, dated July 8, 1915, is void, and that Taylor could not convey an- estate in fee to Spankle, who conveyed to complainants. The chancellor held that the deed of Mrs. Taylor passed ah estate in fee to J. S. Taylor, and that his deed communicated a good title to Sprankle.
Errors are assigned which present complainants’ insistence that the deed of Mrs. Taylor is' void, because the wife could not, by her deed,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Teague v. SowderTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
- Bassett v. BudlongMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- New Memphis Gaslight Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- Bennett v. HutchensTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Strout v. BurgessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
- Runions v. RunionsTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Trapp v. McCormickTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
- Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. v. Kingston Bank & Thust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.