Legal Opinion

Newkirk v. Stevens

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from- W. B. Allen, J., at February Term, 1909, of Duplin. The facts are stated in tlie opinion of tbe Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

Tbis action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover what he alleges to be his share of the proceeds of the sale of certain timber upon the lands described in the complaint. The plaintiff, Swan Hill Newkirk, owned a life estate in the land, and the remaindermen brought, a suit against him to declare the said estate forfeited by reason of waste alleged to-have bafen committed by the said Newkirk. The case was tried, and Newkirk, in 1903, recovered a judgment, in which the jury found, and the court declared, that the estate had not been forfeited,, and further adjudged that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Avery v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Gaylord v. GaylordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Sykes v. Boone.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Branch v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Berthold v. FoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gosnell Ex Rel. Gosnell v. HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Roediger v. . SaposSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Crim v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Colonial Trust Co. v. Sterchie Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Boldt v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API