Boldt v. Baker
Ohio Court of Appeals
Error : Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, brought an action against the executors of the late Charles W. Baker, an attorney at law, practising in Cincinnati. The action was in form similar to the old action for money had and received, plaintiff claiming that the decedent had been unjustly enriched at her expense.
On October 31, 1912, she had entered into a contract with Charles W. Baker, and, on that day paid *126to him $4000, as payment in advance for services in an action for divorce which had theretofore been filed against her by her husband, Charles Boldt. The plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hill v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Coe v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
- Baird v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1853
- Callahan v. ShotwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Drefahl v. Security Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goodman v. Royal Indemnity Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1927