Roediger v. . Sapos
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
The trial before the magistrate was had approximately six weeks prior to the convening of the term of the Superior Court at which the cause was heard. On demand of counsel for the plaintiff the case in the Superior Court had precedence on the calendar over all other cases, except cases involving exceptions to homesteads. C. S., 2373. It was properly called for trial at the beginning of the term.
The defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict for that the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action, even if deemed to have been in apt time, cannot be sustained. The affidavit of plaintiff made…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. CurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Tenney v. . BergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Manning v. Roanoke & Tar River RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- State v. . RobersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Branch v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smith v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Harriet Cotton Mills v. Local Union No. 578, Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Adger v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Perkins v. SykesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.