Legal Opinion

State v. Coffman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 10, 1972No. 31787PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

This is an appeal from an order which suppresses evidence in the form of the results of a breathalyzer test given defendant, in a driving-while-intoxicated case, pursuant to ORS 483.634. The order is based upon a finding by the court that an ampoule containing chemicals used in administering the breath test was qualified as evidence only by hearsay, and its admissibility does not fall within any of the recognized exceptions of the hearsay evidence rule; and that the certificate that purports to certify the accuracy of the use of chemicals in the ampoule contains hearsay.

Defendant was arrested…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. RinesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  4. State v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  5. City of Bremerton v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wester v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. People v. Meikrantz, New York County Courts1974
  4. Commonwealth v. SweetSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. State v. JablonskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API