Commonwealth v. Sweet

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

Appellant was convicted by a jury of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.1 In this appeal he challenges as error the admission into evidence of the results of a breathalyzer chemical intoxication test, and asserts that the judge committed error in permitting certain cross-examination of a district magistrate.

At the trial two police officers testified to appellant’s demeanor at the time of his arrest. They testified that his *374vehicle veered across lanes of traffic, that when he was stopped he had difficulty getting out of his car, that…