Legal Opinion
People v. Meikrantz
New York County Courts
Decided January 8, 1974PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephen Smyk, J.
Appeals (1) by defendant William H. Meikrantz from the judgment of the Justice Court, Town of Union, New York, convicting him of a violation of subdivision 2 of section 1192 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law; and (2) by defendant Joseph W. Kopesky from the judgment of the Justice Court, Town of Vestal, New York, convicting him of a violation of subdivisions 1, 2, and 3 of section 1192 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law.
These appeals present three questions of first impression. First, whether a breath test, to be considered valid in this State, must be performed according to certain Department of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. OlahNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- State v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Sexauer & Lemke v. Luke A. Burke & Sons Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- State v. HoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. FreelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Wester v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. GarneauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. FarmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.