Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. South Carolina State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 3, 1960No. 17692PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was commenced by Southern Railway Company, the petitioner herein, in the original jurisdiction of this Court, pursuant to Section 58-835 of the 1952 Code of Laws of South Carolina. The action is in the nature of an appeal from a decision of the South Carolina State Highway Department, appellant herein, determining that the petitioner should contribute to the cost of the reconstruction of a highway bridge near the corporate limits of the Town of York, South Carolina. The State Highway Department purported to act pursuant to Sections 58-831 et seq., of the 1952 Code of Laws, in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gregg Dyeing Co. v. QuerySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Amos v. MathewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Neil v. Independent Realty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  4. DANTZLER v. CallisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  5. Gregg Dyeing Company v. QuerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Wiring Device Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
  2. Hinrichs v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. Heyward v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  4. Riley v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  5. Major v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API