Legal Opinion
Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. v. Schering-Plough Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 21, 2001No. Civ. 96-4047(HAA)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
ACKERMAN, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the court upon motions of Defendants Schering-Plough Corporation and Schering Corporations (“Schering” or “defendants”) for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial. Plaintiff, Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc., (“Boehringer” or “plaintiff’) opposes these motions. For the reasons stated below, these motions are DENIED.
Background
A. Factual Background
This patent litigation arises from the efforts of Boehringer and of Schering to develop a vaccine for a disease known as Porcine Reproductive Respiratory Syndrome…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Schering-Plough Corporation and Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. v. Apotex Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Lyles v. Flagship Resort Development Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Tamer Turgun v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- United States v. JOHNSON & JOHNSONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025