Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Schering-Plough Corporation and Schering Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
Schering-Plough Corporation and Schering Corporation (“Schering”) appeal the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, finding United States Patent No. 5,476,778 (“'778 patent”) infringed and not invalid. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. (“Boehringer”), the assignee of the '778 patent, cross-appeals based on the district court’s claim construction. We find that substantial evidence supports the verdicts on invalidity and infringement, and affirm the judgment of the district court.
BACKGROUND
Porcine Reproductive Respiratory…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. And Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Doing Business as Labcorp)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Eurand, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Bicon, Inc v. The Straumann CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Home Diagnostics, Inc. v. Lifescan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- OSRAM GmbH v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.