Legal Opinion

United States v. James Phillip Peterson

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 12, 1971No. 16944_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWYGERT, Chief Judge.

On December 7, 1962 two armed men robbed the Archer-Hoyne Savings and Loan Association in Chicago. Appellant, James Phillip Peterson, and Arthur Rachel were charged with the robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d). Peterson was found guilty by the jury at a joint trial during which Rachel pleaded guilty. On this appeal, Peterson assigns three grounds for reversal: a denial of his sixth amendment right to a speedy trial; the admission into evidence of out-of-court statements by Rachel implicating him in the robbery; and the admission of certain identification…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. Dorwin MarineCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. Harold KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Donald A. Rado v. State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. State v. LutzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  3. United States v. Marvin M. HoltzmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Howard Brown and Alexander BishopCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Howard Brown and Alexander BishopCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API