Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Howard Brown and Alexander Bishop

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 24, 1983No. 81, 86, Dockets 81-1136, 81-1138Published

1DissentVan Graafeiland, Circuit Judge

Although I agree with my colleagues that Agent Shea’s questioning of appellant Brown subsequent to Brown’s indictment violated his Sixth Amendment right to the assistance of counsel, see United States v. Henry, 447 U.S. 264, 269-75, 100 S.Ct. 2183, 2186-89, 65 L.Ed.2d 115 (1980), I disagree with their conclusion concerning the harm that resulted. The explanation for my differing view requires a more extensive discussion of the facts than appears in the majority opinion.

*595Maxine Williams, who was an admitted participant in the bank robbery and who was identifiable as such in the bank…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Nelson v. O'NEILSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. George Samuel Walter RogersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API