Legal Opinion

United States v. Howard Brown and Alexander Bishop

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 24, 1983No. 81, 86, Dockets 81-1136, 81-1138Published

1Opinion of the Court

699 F.2d 585

12 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 845

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Howard BROWN and Alexander Bishop, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 81, 86, Dockets 81-1136, 81-1138.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued Sept. 14, 1982.

Decided Jan. 24, 1983.

Bernard S. Greenbaum, Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendant-appellant Brown.

Philip Katowitz, Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendant-appellant Bishop.

Thomas H. Roche, Asst. U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Edward R. Korman, U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y., Mary McGowan Davis, Asst. U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, N.Y., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before LUMBARD,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API