Legal Opinion

Stephens v. First Commercial Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 12, 2010No. 1080648PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STUART, Justice.

First Commercial Bank (“FCB”) sued Charles H. Stephens in the Jefferson Circuit Court, alleging that Stephens had defaulted on a $648,118 promissory note he had executed in favor of FCB. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of FCB awarding it $737,686, and Stephens appealed. We affirm.

I

Beginning in January 2005, Stephens signed and renewed a series of promissory notes with FCB, each in an amount of approximately $650,000. On November 7, 2007, Stephens paid off a previous promissory note and executed the promissory note at issue in this case, the value of which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Williams v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Dow v. Alabama Democratic PartySupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coleman v. BAC ServicingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  2. Sullivan v. H & M Industrial Services, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. David Lee Fitts v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Etowah Circuit Court: CC-20-420.70 and CC-21-1431.70)Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2025
  4. Stephens v. First Commercial BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API