Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. H & M Industrial Services, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 16, 2012No. 2110945PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Judge.

H & M Industrial Services, Inc. (“H & M”), and ThyssenKrupp Steel USA, LLC (“ThyssenKrupp”), (hereinafter referred to collectively as “the petitioners”) petition this court for a writ of mandamus to the Washington Circuit Court (“the trial court”) directing it to grant their motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer the case to the Mobile Circuit Court on the basis of improper venue. We grant the petition and issue the writ.

Procedural History

On March 15, 2012, Adrian Sullivan filed a complaint in the trial court against the petitioners; Harvey Casey; Stevens Pain-ton…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Finance America Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Ex Parte Inverness Construction CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Ex Parte Pfizer, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Ex Parte Children's Hospital of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  5. Ex Parte KaneSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reed v. Diamond Scaffold Services Group, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API