Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Dembitzer

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1956Published

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

On occasion, the road to unwanted litigation — as may often be the case in respect of other undesirable destinations• — -is paved with good intentions. I am constrained to make this lugubrious observation because of what has occurred in the instant case.

The present parties intended in good faith to avoid what were deemed to be the labyrinthine and expensive paths of the law as administered in the civil courts of our State. They agreed, therefore, to submit a controversy between them to arbitration before their industry tribunal — as a simple and prompt solution of their commercial dispute.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Raven Electric Co. v. LinzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. In re the Arbitration between Nadalen Full Fashion Knitting Mills, Inc. & Barbizon Knitwear Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Spring v. MoncrieffNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Gutchen v. DembitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API