Legal Opinion

Spring v. Moncrieff

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1955PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

Bach defendant separately moves (with supporting affidavits) to dismiss both causes of action pleaded in the complaint, pursuant to subdivision 7 of rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice, on the ground that the alleged agreement there set forth is unenforcible under the Statute of Frauds; and to dismiss the second cause of action, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106, on the ground that this count fails on its face to allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The plaintiff relies upon the sufficiency of the second count as pleaded; and, in opposition to the motion seeking…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Amies v. WesnofskeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Harmon v. Alfred Peats Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Papaioannou v. BritzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  5. Parver v. Matthews-Kadetsky Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kuffler v. ListDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  2. Grattan v. Societa Per Azzioni Cotonficio CantoniNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Spring v. MoncrieffNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Mesiano v. MazzeoNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Lee v. St. Joe Paper Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API