Claussen v. Amberg
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
Plaintiff and defendant occupying the same relative positions in this court as in the trial court, they will be designated accordingly.
Plaintiff filed his petition against H. Am-berg, if living, and if dead, his unknown heirs, etc., and against M. S. Ryan, as county treasurer, alleging plaintiff was the owner of certain lands, to wit, blocks 37, 38, 39, 46, 47, and the east half of blocks 49, 50 and 51, in Brooklyn addition to Oklahoma City, and II. Amberg claimed some interest in the lands, and plaintiff prays that the county treasurer be required to cancel all taxes for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Goddard v. OrdwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Norton v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Philip Carey Co. v. VickersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Willson v. CleavelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Claussen v. AmbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Amberg v. ClaussenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Claussen v. AmbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Vance v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936