Legal Opinion
Claussen v. Amberg
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 19, 1935No. 21684PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This action was commenced by defendant in error to quiet title to certain real property, seeking in connection therewith the cancellation of certain tax deeds.
Defendant Claussen answered claiming title under said tax deed, and particularly a correction tax deed, and pleaded the statute of limitation, under section 9746, 1926 Supplement to C. O. S. 1921 (12754, O. S. 1931) ; under section 9753, C. O. S. 1921 (12763, O. S. 1931), and subdivision 3, section 183, C. O. S. 1921 (99, O. S. 1931). The cause was tried to the court, resulting in a judgment and decree for plaintiff quieting his title…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stumpff v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Stevens v. DillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- New York Baptist Union for Ministerial Education v. AtwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Gregg v. LeachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Dow v. Cowley-Frye Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Vinson v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Wiley Electric, Inc. v. BrantleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Haught v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Ritchie v. KeeneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Rock Island Improvement Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.