Legal Opinion
State of New Hampshire v. Kurt Carpentino
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 14, 2014No. 2012-632PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.
The defendant, Kurt Carpentino, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Arnold, J.) denying his motion to amend one of his sentences, originally imposed in 2003, based upon an amendment to RSA 632-A:4 (Supp. 2002) (amended 2003,2005,2008,2010) that took effect after the offense but before his conviction became final. We affirm.
I
The pertinent facts are undisputed on appeal. In 2003, the defendant was found guilty of, among other charges, aggravated felonious sexual assault (AFSA), for which he was sentenced to serve SVz to 20 years in prison. The conviction was based upon an indictment that…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Dorsey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Warden v. MarreroSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CookeUtah Supreme Court · 2025
- State v. Bailey P. SerpaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- State v. Drew FullerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Carpentino v. HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- In re Guardianship of D.E.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.