Alger-Fowler Co. v. Tracy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Hen-nepin county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Holt, J.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action, commenced March 2, 1905, to recover from the defendant an alleged balance of $5,958.12 as money had and received to the plaintiff’s use. The answer alleged that the defendant had accounted to the plaintiff for all moneys'received from it, except the sum of $130.62, and set up a counterclaim in the sum of $856.25. The reply put in issue the allegations as to the counterclaim and new matter in the answer. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and as a conclusion of law based on the facts found, it directed judgment in favor of the defendant, that the plaintiff take nothing by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Daniels v. NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Dugan v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
- Stanford v. McGillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- American Manufacturing Co. v. KlarquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gilman v. GilmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
- Engel v. MahlenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Plotkin v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Matteson v. United States & Canada Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Rishmiller v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.