Legal Opinion

Plotkin v. Northland Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 1939No. 31,556PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

Appeal by plaintiff from judgment for defendant on the pleadings and opening statement of counsel for plaintiff, which makes the facts appear as follows:

December 25, 1934, plaintiff, Samuel Plotkin, was driving from Spring Park to Minneapolis. Following was a bus, operated by defendant company and driven by its employe. The bus had trouble passing Plotkin’s car. Plotkin did not hear the bus’s horn and failed to make room for the bus to pass on the left, as required by 1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 2720-14. After a time the bus did get ahead. In Crystal Bay the bus stopped at an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Gosselin v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Brown v. Boston Ice Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Johanson v. Pioneer Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Alger-Fowler Co. v. TracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Mahutga v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. ReddickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Clemmons v. Life Insurance Company of GeorgiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Lange v. National Biscuit CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Hays v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. Sandman v. HaganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API